Information portal on various topics of management of public resources of the Portuguese State

Project sheet

Name

Assistant researcher in Biological Sciences

Total project amount

123,39 thousand €

Amount paid

0 €

Non-refundable funding

123,39 thousand €

Loan funding

0 €

Start date

01.02.2025

Expected end date

31.03.2026

Dimension

Resilience

Component

Qualifications and Skills

Investment

Science Plus Training

Operation code

02/C06-i06/2024.P2023.15623.TENURE.132

Summary

Besides furthering the most productive disciplinary scientific fields at the University of Coimbra, one of the key strategic research areas the University of Coimbra would like to address on a permanent basis with the FCT Tenure Call is that of Science Communication, Societal Engagement and Community Outreach.  These are transversal areas that are coming into their own in terms of Research, and represent, in our opinion, an out-of-the-box potential for future high level and impactful research activities other than the typical disciplinary audiences, with clear societal implications and the ability to engage communities outside of academia. In order to do this robust research programs linked to permanent positions are needed, not ad-hoc part time efforts linked to short-term objectives. We have included six such positions, which intersect and interconnect (but do not overlap), including Science Communication, Science Entrepreneurship & Innovation and Research-based organization of outreach structures (Museum, Botanical Garden and Exploratório-UC). This policy is in line with the social responsibility of research institutions, not only in providing added curated information, but in performing meaningful research into the impact of these activities, and basing future developments on the results.For the Science Outreach Structures there are four Researcher positions. This specific position is to carry out research on science outreach and popularization activities at the Botanical Garden. This Rectory-dependent structure performs a key service in terms, not only of providing a space for public enjoyment, but also in organizing activities on science-based education on different types of plants (medicinal, ornamental, foodstuff, local and exotic plants from the Portuguese colonial times), as well as historical collections of different origins, both of living plants, seeds and dry samples. Paradoxically little research has been carried out to ensure the true impact of these activities, locally or nationally (or in connection with other Botanical gardens), or in order to adapt them to current times and narratives (such as biological heritage, biodiversity loss, fighting hunger, GMOs or climate change). Unlike the Exploratório-UC, which caters to families (very young children and their parents), both the Botanical Garden and Science Museum host adolescents (at a crucial time of education decision-making), and adults of different ages (including senior citizens), a totally different audience, which also includes a large volume of foreign tourists, a growing dynamic and research-prone population not yet addressed. This can be exploited in terms of research-based approaches to understand the dynamics at play, and how they can be tapped into for maximal effect and societal engagement, a key goal of Research-Based institutions.Thus, there are several key questions (and hypotheses stemming from them) that the Researcher could address in their research program, using tools such as comprehensive surveys, focus groups or diversely structured interviews with the Botanical Garden audience. Are the activities and exhibits carried out at the Botanical Garden effective in terms of outreach? Are the experiences inclusive, or is there a stratification in terms of different populations (age, education, gender, background)? Are visitors from different countries similar or dissimilar in terms of their experiences? What type of activities are more effective, and why? What types of topics seem more impactful, and why? Do visitors actually learn what was expected from exhibit organizers, or is this a futile effort in some cases? If the latter is true, in which ones, and what exactly can be proposed in terms of innovative approaches to maximize productive engagement with science in this sort of infrastructure, and towards the different types of audiences that visit? Could innovative strategies such as cocreation and other forms of citizen participation in the planning and preparation of activities and exhibits boost the effectiveness of these outreach efforts? These are some aspects in an emerging field, that deserves dedicated and focused researchers, and which does not overlap with the other positions, given the number and reach of the many activities involved.The hired researcher would be fully dedicated to this field of study, and, expected to participate in teams that submit funding proposals, attend specialized meetings, create/participate in networks with other Botanical Gardens, publish results. Together with the other positions proposed we expect to form a cohesive core of Researchers on different aspects of outreach and societal engagement, leading to a more inclusive and research-based community involvement. For this purpose, we believe that the Rectory needs to be summoned, so as both to ensure a transversal research plan involving different fields of study and infrastructures, and to not burden individual research centers.

Beneficiaries

Within the scope of the Recovery and Resilience Plan, two types of beneficiaries are responsible for carrying out the projects and using the funding provided. Due to their similar role, the reference to these two types of beneficiaries has been simplified and unified under the term "Beneficiary".
The two types are::
  • Direct Beneficiaries are those whose funding and projects to implement are part of the Recovery and Resilience Plan that has been negotiated and approved by the European Union;
  • Final Beneficiaries are those whose funding and projects to implement are approved following a selection process through Calls for Applications.

Call for applications

As part of the Call for Applications, submissions are requested to select the projects and final beneficiaries to whom funding will be awarded. Specific selection criteria are defined for each call, which must be reflected in the applications submitted and assessed.

The project is appraised on the basis of its compliance with the selection criteria laid down in the calls for applications, and a final score may be awarded, where applicable.

Final evaluation score

8,9
Important note

The components for calculating the assessment score can be found in the selection criteria document mentioned below.

Selection criteria

The funding selection criteria to which this project and its final beneficiary were subject and its score can be found in detail on the Recuperar Portugal platform.

Beneficiaries

Intermediate beneficiaries

Beneficiaries

Procurement

Beneficiaries representing public entities implement their project by signing one or more contracts with suppliers for goods or services through public procurement procedures.

To ensure and provide the utmost transparency in all these contracts, a list of the contracts that were signed under this project is available here, along with the information available on the Base.Gov platform. Please note that, according to the legislation in force at the time the contract was signed, some exceptions do not require the publication of the contracts signed on this platform, and, therefore, no information is available in such cases.

Geographic distribution

123,39 thousand €

Total amount of the project

Where was the money spent

By county

1 county financed .

  • Coimbra 123,39 thousand € ,
Source EMRP
10.02.2026
All themes
Transparency without leading